HAZLITT'S STYLE
Introduction
William Hazlitt is a well-known figure in English literature. He gained fame as an essayist and made a significant contribution to English essays.
Hazlitt's Writing Style
Hazlitt was a talented prose writer with a unique style. He wrote with deep conviction and aimed to connect with his readers. Without trying to follow a specific pattern, he developed his own style, known as the familiar style.
Familiar Style
Hazlitt’s style was natural and personal. He described it as free from artificiality and unnecessary complexity. He chose simple, commonly used words rather than fashionable ones. His writing had a conversational quality, making it both effective and engaging. His style was clear, precise, and pure in expression.
Choice of Words
Hazlitt’s writing was marked by clarity and strength. He carefully selected words, avoiding old-fashioned or unnecessary ones. He disliked overly grand or pompous language and always used the right words in the right places.
Use of Figures of Speech and Sentences
Hazlitt often used figures of speech to emphasize his ideas. His essays contained vivid descriptions, even of abstract concepts. For example, he compared the human mind to a clock that constantly needs winding up. His sentences were usually short, direct, and energetic. He often used balanced and contrasting sentences to highlight opposing ideas.
Aphorisms and Quotes
According to Hugh Walker, Hazlitt was a master of aphorisms—short, meaningful statements. Like Francis Bacon, many of his sentences could be expanded into full essays. When expressing strong opinions, his words became sharp and powerful. He also frequently used epigrams, paradoxes, and quotations, sometimes excessively.
Personal Touch in Essays
Hazlitt’s essays were highly personal. Whatever the topic, he made it about himself, often recalling past experiences. His essays reflected his thoughts and observations, sometimes mocking the weaknesses of society.
Informal Yet Serious Tone
Hazlitt’s essays had an informal style, but they were not lighthearted. He focused more on ideas than on strict structure. His discussions often introduced new thoughts, making his essays rich in insight and reflection.
Conclusion
Despite some flaws—such as complex sentence structures and occasional repetition—Hazlitt’s style remains vivid, powerful, and direct. As R.L. Stevenson remarked, "Though we are mighty fine fellows nowadays, we can't write like William Hazlitt."