Crisis in Orientalism
Crisis in Orientalism – Summary
Edward Said’s work Crisis in Orientalism is a crucial section of his groundbreaking book Orientalism (1978), where he critiques the Western study of the East, arguing that it is deeply rooted in colonial power structures. In this essay, Said explores the intellectual and moral crisis faced by traditional Orientalists as their field is challenged by emerging critical perspectives.
Key Points of the Work:
-
The Crisis of Legitimacy in Orientalism
Said argues that Orientalism, the Western study of the East, has been a long-standing intellectual tradition that shaped European and American perceptions of the Orient. However, by the mid-20th century, this field faced a crisis as scholars from the formerly colonized regions began questioning the authority of Western academics to represent Eastern societies."The major shift in the study of the Orient has been the emergence of the Orient itself as a politically and intellectually independent entity."
-
Challenge to Objectivity and Authority
Traditional Orientalists claimed to study the East with scientific objectivity, but Said exposes how their work was intertwined with colonial power. He critiques scholars like Bernard Lewis, who resisted recognizing the political implications of their research. Instead of a neutral academic field, Orientalism is revealed as a discourse of power that justified Western dominance."The fact that the Orientalist was neither interested in nor capable of discussing the Orient on the same level as a Westerner shows the fundamental bias in the field."
-
Decolonization and the Rise of Postcolonial Scholarship
With the rise of national liberation movements in Asia and Africa, native scholars began producing knowledge about their own histories and cultures. This shift undermined Orientalism’s credibility, leading to a crisis in the discipline. Scholars from the Global South rejected the Eurocentric framework and demanded new, decolonized perspectives."The challenge of postcolonial scholarship lies in its demand for a recognition of the Orient not as an object of study but as a subject of its own history."
-
The End of Traditional Orientalism?
Said suggests that while classical Orientalism is in crisis, its legacy persists in modern forms, such as media representations and political discourse. Western portrayals of the Middle East in journalism and policy-making still reflect Orientalist stereotypes. This means that while academia has evolved, the core issues remain."Although the old Orientalist has disappeared, a new Orientalism has taken its place in political and media discourses, shaping perceptions of the Middle East."
Conclusion
Crisis in Orientalism highlights how Western scholarship on the East has been shaped by colonial interests and how its legitimacy has been challenged by postcolonial critiques. Said’s analysis remains relevant today, as Orientalist narratives continue to influence Western foreign policy and cultural representations.